Add Row
Add Element
UPDATE
August 17.2025
2 Minutes Read

City Council's 'Too Tough to Die' Resolution Boosts Daily News Union Efforts

Daily News Union Resolution group advocating in city plaza.

City Council Supports Daily News Workers Amidst Ongoing Struggles

On August 14, 2025, a resolution dubbed "Too Tough to Die" was introduced to support the Daily News workers in their protracted struggle against their hedge fund owners, Alden Global Capital. The resolution, co-sponsored by Council Members Carmen De La Rosa and Julie Menin, calls on Alden to recognize the workers' contributions and engage in good faith negotiations. This resolution signifies a significant move in the three-year-long battle for fair labor practices in the media industry.

The Significance of the Resolution’s Title

The name "Too Tough to Die" is reminiscent of a 1984 album by the iconic punk band The Ramones. The choice of this title reflects the resilience of the Daily News workforce amidst threats of layoffs and diminishing resources.' Such references abound in discussions about media survival, particularly for local newspapers facing financial turmoil.

A Rallying Cry for Journalistic Integrity

The introduction of the resolution coincided with a rally held in Foley Square, underscoring the importance of community support for journalism. In attendance were notable figures including News Guild New York President Susan DeCarava, highlighted by the poignant setting of the Lorenzo Pace sculpture, which celebrates the African-American experience. This symbolism was not lost on attendees, as the gathering reaffirmed their commitment to protecting journalistic integrity.

A Historical Context of Media Struggles

While the Daily News faces mounting pressures, history shows that even prominent papers are not immune to the challenges posed by hedge fund ownership. Echoing past narratives, veteran reporter Kerry Burke highlighted the notion that such owners often prioritize profits over the democratic role of journalism, further fueling public concern about the state of information access in society.

Impact and Relevance to Today's Media Landscape

This resolution and its surrounding events illustrate a growing realization among both workers and the public regarding the fragility of local news outlets. As journalism grapples with the influence of corporate interests, the advocacy for worker rights at the Daily News signifies a broader call to action for fair labor across various sectors. Momentum is building, and it remains to be seen how Alden Global Capital will respond to this renewed pressure.

The efforts of the Daily News workforce highlight a crucial moment in the fight for journalistic survival. As these discussions unfold, it's essential for communities and readers to engage and support the hallmarks of their local media—vital threads in the fabric of democracy.

National News

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts

What Trump's Support for Putin means for Ukraine and Global Politics

Update Trump's Shift Toward Putin's Proposal on Donbas In a surprising move, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed Russian President Vladimir Putin's call for Russia to take full control of the Donbas region in Ukraine. This marks a notable shift from Trump's previous stance, where he advocated for a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict. His reorientation toward a peace agreement suggests an intriguing evolution in his diplomatic strategy, raising questions about the implications for U.S. foreign policy and global security. The Broader Impact of Trump's Support Trump's endorsement of Putin's proposal could have significant repercussions. Analysts warn that this may embolden Moscow's aggressive posture within Ukraine and further destabilize the region. The ramifications may extend beyond East Europe as allies and adversaries alike react to the perceived change in U.S. posture. As national security conversations evolve, this stance poses a dilemma about how the U.S. can balance its commitments in NATO and its relations with Ukraine amidst changing leadership dynamics. Comparing Political Responses to Russian Demands International reactions to Trump’s backing of Putin have been mixed, highlighting deep divides in the global approach to the Ukraine crisis. Some political leaders advocate for a robust response to Russian advances, insisting that yielding territory could lead to more dangerous precedents. On the other hand, proponents of negotiation argue that embracing dialogue may open pathways to sustainable peace in the region, a contentious point that reflects the complexities of international diplomacy. What Does This Mean for Future Peace Talks? As Trump leans toward a reconciliatory approach, observers are also questioning what this might mean for future peace agreements. Former national security advisors indicate that a strategy revolving around negotiations over confrontation might allow for a more stable future in Ukraine. However, skepticism remains among those concerned that engaging too closely with Russia might compromise Ukraine's sovereignty. The Ongoing Debate Surrounding U.S. Foreign Policy This latest development revives a central debate in U.S. foreign policy—how to engage with adversaries while promoting democratic values abroad. The long-term effects of aligning with Putin's agenda could redefine America's geopolitical stance, inviting discussions about ethical implications and strategic priorities across political lines. As the situation unfolds, it is crucial for legal, financial, and healthcare professionals—those who shape and abide by policy frameworks—to remain informed about these developments. Understanding the nuances of such international relationships may influence future regulations and business opportunities.

Trump's Striking Takeaways from the Putin Summit: What Legal and Financial Pros Should Know

Update Trump's Hushed Insights: A Deep Dive into the Putin Summit In a recent interview with Sean Hannity, former President Donald Trump shed light on his highly publicized summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, offering ten notable takeaways that signal significant geopolitical implications. Despite the somber backdrop of ongoing tensions surrounding the Ukraine conflict, Trump’s statements suggest a strategy that could either escalate or de-escalate international hostilities. The Context of the Summit The summit took place against the backdrop of a serious geopolitical crisis, namely the Ukraine war, where Trump's remarks hinted at his view that this conflict could have been avoided if he were still in office. Such a claim not only highlights the fractures between current and former administrations but also feeds into a larger narrative of American strength versus perceived global weaknesses under the current leadership. Key Insights: What Trump Revealed Among Trump's insights, he emphasized that Putin made a compelling 'business pitch' during their discussions—an interesting dynamic that underscores the often transactional nature of diplomacy. Trump also referred to potential future summits, leaving the door open for ongoing dialogue, albeit with the caveat that 'there's no deal until there's a deal.' Implications for Global Politics Trump's takeaways resonate with broader themes of American foreign policy and its implications for global security. The former president's mention of a potential third World War during his term serves as a stark reminder of the serious threats that still loom large in international relations. Key figures like Mike Pompeo echoed Trump's stance, emphasizing the strategic leverage that can be exercised in such settings. Conclusion: The Need for Continuous Engagement As the world watches closely, Trump's reflections on the summit can prompt critical discussions among policymakers and analysts. Engaging in discourse can shed light on potential pathways for peace and stability in a region fraught with complexities. To stay informed about the evolving geopolitical landscape and how it might impact various sectors—including legal, financial, and healthcare—it’s crucial to engage with credible news outlets and analysis.

Zelenskyy Accused of Sabotaging Trump-Putin Summit Amid Drone Strikes

Update Controversy Erupts Over Ukrainian Drone Strikes In a dramatic accusation, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has claimed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is attempting to sabotage the upcoming summit between former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Greene's remarks follow a series of Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian territory, which she asserts are intended to disrupt the negotiations between the U.S. and Russia. Historical Context of U.S.-Russia Relations The U.S.-Russia dynamic has been marred with tension since the onset of the Ukraine invasion in 2022. With Trump’s upcoming summit likely to touch upon a potential ceasefire, Greene's allegations follow a long line of accusations against Ukraine from various political influencers, who argue that escalating military actions could hinder peace efforts. Implications for Diplomatic Relations Greene's comments have garnered mixed reactions, revealing the divisive opinions surrounding U.S. support for Ukraine. Some Republican lawmakers argue that these strikes compromise not only Trump's negotiating power but also peace prospects in the region. Others press for an unwavering commitment to support Ukraine against Russian aggression, suggesting that condemnation of Zelenskyy could undermine U.S. foreign policy goals. The Stakes at the Trump-Putin Summit As the Trump-Putin summit approaches, the implications of these drone strikes may resonate beyond immediate diplomatic relations, influencing public perception of U.S. support for Ukraine. Will Trump's leadership be viewed as a potential pathway to peace, or will Greene's assertions overshadow the summit's agenda? Such questions linger as the world watches, highlighting the critical balance of power in international diplomacy.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*